英语电影类型有哪些问题

㈠ 电影种类的英语

恐怖片。 thirrer
喜剧 comedy
动作片 documencary
action muvie

㈡ 英语电影问题

《蒙特克罗》，三个好姐妹的美丽奇遇，各个漂亮啊。英文电影，最适合你们！

㈢ 电影种类【英语单词】

文艺片literary story
战争片war movie
侦探片detective story
爱情片affectional film
悬疑片 suspense film

㈣ 如何用英语表达不同的电影类型

主要类型的电影可以用英语这样表达：

1、喜剧：Comedy

2、冒险：Adventure

3、幻想：Fantasy

4、悬念：Mystery

5、惊悚：Thriller

6、战争：War

7、西部：Western

8、爱情：Romance

9、恐怖：Horror

10、动作：Action

11、科幻：Sci-Fi

12、犯罪：Crime

(4)英语电影类型有哪些问题扩展阅读：

所谓类型电影，是指由于不同题材或技巧而形成的影片范畴、种类或形式。按照不同类型 （或称样式）的规定要求制作出来的影片。其具有基本特征：公式化的情节，定型化的人物，图解式的视觉影像。主要类型影片有喜剧片、西部片、罪片、幻想片等。

类型电影的制作根据观众的心理特点，在一定时期内以某一类型作为制作重点，即采取所谓"热潮更替"方式。在人们厌烦了西部片之后，便换上恐怖片，然后再继之以其他类型影片，如此周转不息，反复轮换。在诸多的影片类型中，最有典型性的是四个类型，即喜剧片、西部片、犯罪片、幻想片。

类型电影作为一种拍片方法，实质上是一种艺术产品标准化的规范。它的规定性和对影片创作者的强制力，只有在以制片人专权为特点的大制片厂制度下才有可能发生作用。因此，随着大制片厂制度在五十年代以后的逐渐解体，各种类型之间的严格界线趋于模糊，愈来愈成为一般意义上的样式划分了。

㈤ 电影有多少种类型用英语怎么表达

电影类型主要有：Comedy喜剧、Thriller惊悚、Romance爱情、Horror恐怖、Action动作、Sci-Fi科幻、Crime犯罪、War战争。

音乐电影、黑帮电影、纪录电影、公路电影、意识流电影、动画电影、惊悚电影、西部电影、人物电影、飞车电影、家庭电影、超级英雄电影。其中，动画电影包括卡通。

(5)英语电影类型有哪些问题扩展阅读：

电影具有独自的特征，在艺术表现力上不但具有其它各种艺术的特征，又因可以运用蒙太奇（法语：Montage）这种艺术性突跃的电影组接技巧，具有超越其它一切艺术的表现手段。

电影可以大量复制放映，随着现代社会的发展，电影已深入到人类社会生活的方方面面，是人们日常生活不可或缺的一部分。

㈥ 英语电影的一些问题

哈 这个我知道
有个软件的
可以转化 我以前就下过
好象叫狐狸少爷
Total Video Converter 3.11 Final
你网络下就可以看到

不过因为没注册 是免费用 所以只能转换一半 不过将就吧

㈦ 电影有哪几种类型，（*英文的）

喜剧/Comedy
冒险/Adventure
幻想/Fantasy
悬念/Mystery
惊悚/Thriller
记录/Documentary
战争/War
西部/Western
爱情/Romance
剧情/Drama
恐怖/Horror
动作/Action
科幻/Sci-Fi
音乐/Music
家庭/Music
犯罪/Crime
成人/Alt

㈧ 用英语说一种电影类型以及你对这些问题的简单评论

comedy喜剧片
drama 剧情片
action 动作片
disaster 灾难片
thrill 恐怖片
road 公路片
alt 成人片
film-noir 黑色电影（描写社会阴暗面的影片）
sci-fi film 科幻片
animated cartoon卡通片
autobiographical film自传电影
comedy 戏剧
propaganda film宣传片
silent film 无声电影
sound film 有声电影
suspense film 悬念片
telecine 电视电影
vaudeville 轻歌舞剧

㈨ 电影的类型有什么我要英文的

Film Genres

I INTRODUCTION
Film Genres, categories of film characterized by frequently recurring patterns of form, style, and, particularly, subject matter. There is no clear consensus among film historians and critics on the number of genres, or on the line of demarcation between one genre and another. This must be borne in mind when considering the following list of major genres: Adventure; Biography; Comedy; Drama and Melodrama; Fantasy/Horror/Science Fiction; Gangster/Crime/Spy/Film Noir; Musical; Problem Picture; War; Western. Some commentators would argue that the category “Gangster/Crime/Spy/Film Noir” clearly incorporates two, if not more, distinct genres, as it could be seen to include films as diverse as The Maltese Falcon (John Huston, 1941) and Sunset Boulevard (Billy Wilder, 1950). Similarly, the old instry category “Women's Pics” straddles at least two classifications: Film Noir and Melodrama. Only the Hollywood cinema has been considered. Obviously, genres exist in the popular cinemas of other countries, although, apart from such clear-cut exceptions as samurai films of Japan or kung fu pictures from Hong Kong, the categories applied are normally derived from Hollywood. Clearly there are interesting differences between, say, a British crime film and an American example, but on the whole these have yet to be studied. Differences between genres tend to be identified more in terms of themes, stars, use of costumes, and settings and locations, than in terms of specific aspects of film-making practice such as editing.

II HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
In the days of the studio proction lines, placement of films within genres tended to be part of the thinking of studio executives in their decisions about proction and marketing policy, and were reiterated in the trade papers. Thus, notions about many film genres actually preceded explicit critical analysis. While critical accounts of a film genre tend, appropriately, to be descriptive, the same ideas in the mind of a procer or accountant are often prescriptive, based on a notion of what audiences will find acceptable in, say, a Western.

When critics started to analyse Hollywood films in depth, this link with the collective, entertainment, money-making aspect of the proction system, rather than its initially unrecognized personal, artistic dimension, contributed to an emphasis on the negative aspects of the genres, for example, the limits their conventions imposed on creativity. However, as Colin McArthur argued in his pioneering genre study Underworld USA (1972): “the responses of film-makers and audiences to the genres seem to offer a good prime facie case for believing that they are animating rather than neutral, that they carry particular charges of meaning independently of whatever is brought to them by particular directors.”

Certainly, it seems unlikely to be coincidence that much of the finest work of Howard Hawks, John Ford, Anthony Mann, and, more recently Clint Eastwood, has been in the Western genre. Nevertheless, only minor or mediocre directors can be said to be defined by their relationship to a genre, and each of the four cited has inflected the genre in significantly different ways, both stylistically and thematically, as well as having done important work in other genres.

III DEVELOPMENT OF GENRES
Clearly film genres change over time as society, the audience, and the institutions of proction change. New stars come along, new themes emerge, new conventions of characterization evolve. The exact nature of these shifts is largely outside the conscious awareness of those responsible for bringing them about, however. The procer, director, writer, and star tend to think in terms of decisions that will make a work more interesting, or generate a more compelling star role, rather than how to modify the genre in response to shifts in society.

Some points relating the development of particular genres to changes in film technology are simple and obvious: there is nothing incongruous about a silent Western, and the genre has been on the screen since The Great Train Robbery (1903, directed by Edwin S. Porter), but the idea of a silent musical is obviously ridiculous, despite the fact that live musical accompaniment ensured that most cinemas were never really silent. Similarly, continually improving techniques for special effects have given new life to the Fantasy/Science Fiction/Horror genre, from 2001: A Space Odyssey (Stanley Kubrick, 1968) on through Star Wars (George Lucas, 1977), and Close Encounters of the Third Kind (Steven Spielberg, 1977) to the cycle of Alien films (Ridley Scott, 1979; James Cameron, 1986; David Fincher, 1992).

Popular films are not a simple reflection of the society that proced them: they are complex texts, systems of discourse certain strands of which bear traces of particular features of the society that generated them. Exactly what mechanisms are involved, however, varies from case to case, and may often be impossible to tease out. Thus, comparisons made between characteristics of the indivial genres, or between one era and another, must be provisional and tentative.

For example, in the 1930s, the great period of the gangster film, there were few major Westerns, and those there were came at the start and end of the decade. In the era of classic Hollywood cinema (from the late 1920s to the decline of the studio system around 1960) both these genres regularly involved conflicts between good and evil.

However, perhaps because part of the gangster film's concern was to indicate the social origins of crime, it is typically the gangster's journey the audience follows, and thus there is strong, if only partial, identification with him. His refusal to accept the restrictions of the urban environment, together with the energy of his indivialism, made him a dangerously fascinating, possibly sympathetic, character when contrasted with the less colourful representatives of law and order.

Indeed, this patina of charisma has persisted through to the present. It is part of the complex appeal of The Godfather series (Francis Ford Coppola: Part I, 1972; Part II, 1974; Part III, 1990), inviting the audience to collude with the actions of Michael Corleone. In the more pastoral world of the classic Western, on the other hand, the hero may have been a loner, but he normally represented the best values of the community. Moreover, it was his progress the audience followed, and thus it was he with whom it identified. Consequently, he was the one with charisma, rather than the villain, whose ultimate defeat and death were not mourned in the same way as the classic gangster's.

Though attempts to specify precisely where Western and gangster genres fit in an overall account of the generic categories of popular cinema are likely to generate academic controversy, all commentators agree on their existence as genres. This makes them appropriate choices for the accounts of generic difference and change given above. Though much has been left out, this is an example of the kind of analysis that can be made in relation to other genres.

㈩ 关于英语电影的一些问题

1.泰坦尼克号 sad romantic
2.生死时速2 boring exciting
3.狮子王 funny