電影內容怎麼介紹英語

⑸ 用英語描述一個電影的內容

Transformers
My favourite movie is Transformers 3. This film was made in America. It used a lot of high-techs and computer special effects. I like it very much. This film has huge scenes and famous movie stars. Besides, it has good story, and it told me to respect anybody protects us. This film asked us to be brave to fight the enemies and have the courage to live in the danger. It also have a lot of robot troys I like. This is my favourite movie.
翻譯：
我最喜歡的電影是變形金剛3.這部電影是在美國.它使用了很多高技術和電腦特效.我非常喜歡它.這部電影有巨大的場景和著名的電影明星.此外,它有很好的故事,它讓我尊重保護我們.它告訴我們要勇敢地與敵人進行斗爭,有勇氣在危險中生存.它也有很多我喜歡的機器人玩具總動員.這是我最喜歡的電影.

⑹ 怎麼用英語介紹一部電影

…'The Terminal' is the latest Hanks/Spielberg collaboration, and though it's not quite as good as 'Catch Me if You Can' or 'Saving Private Ryan' it still makes for a fun watch. The plot, as everyone already knows, is about Krakoan (sp?) immigrant Victor Narvorski (Tom Hanks) whose home country – the fictional land of Krakoa (think Russia or Czechoslovakia) – is torn apart in war while he is in a plane headed for New York. When he lands JFK airport head Frank Dixon (Stanley Tucci) tells him that since he literally doesn't have a country he must stay in the airport terminal until all the hoopla settles. Dixon thinks that Narvorski will ignore him, escape into New York and 'become someone else's problem'. What Dixon doesn't know is that Victor is an honest man, and he will obey the rules and stay in the terminal until he's allowed to leave.

The character of Victor Narvorski is one of those classic movie characters who has no conceivable flaw (other than a minimal understanding of the world around him – and an accent) and dose everything he can to help everyone else. Similar characters that spring to mind are Peter Sellers' Chauncey Gardner from the 1979 satire 'Being There' and John Goodman's Charlie Meadows from the Coen movie 'Barton Fink'. All of these characters are dim-witted, but great people who put their own lives on hold to help their friends.

Some of these friends include Airport worker Enrique Cruz (Diego Luna), who Victor helps get hitched with a beautiful security guard (Zoë Saldana) and Amelia Warren (Catherine Zeta-Jones) a nice, flighty flight attendant who Narvorski inspires to get out of a troubled relationship with a married man.

The Hanks and Zeta-Jones characters strike up a little romance, but luckily its not too overblown, it's more of a subplot than anything.

It takes sometime but soon Narvorski is accepted into a small group of Airport workers including Cruz, kindly Joe Mulroy (Chi McBride) and janitor Gupta Raja (Kumar Pallana), who at first thinks that Narvorski is a federal agent out to get him. These characters are all well written and even better acted, but I thought they could've been awarded with a little more screen time. After all, the three are very good actors. But I guess Luna is still riding off the success of 'Y U Mama Tambien' and McBride, despite the fact that he's been working for many years, is still trying to find a big role that's right for him (which I doubt he'll get from 'I, Robot').

It's Pallana who has the biggest role here, and man, does he deserve it. Very old, and very foreign, he was brought to surprising cult fame when Wes Anderson gave him the role of 'Pagoda' in the 2001 hit 'The Royal Tenenbaums'. Who doesn't remember the short, quiet, hilarious butler of the Tenenbaum family? His role in this is a great follow-up; he is funny, and surprisingly touching and dramatic in a very tense scene near the end that I wont spoil. In any other movie the role of the Indian janitor would be an easy target, but this character isn't funny because he's Indian, but instead funny because he's clever, a little cynical and wily. He stole every scene he's in from under Tom Hanks, or Zeta-Jones, or whoever. This is a long shot, but I think the man deserves an Oscar nomination.

The acting in this movie is the greatest factor – well, that and the huge Terminal set built only for the movie. Some critics are complaining about an underwritten and underused Catherine Zeta-Jones. Whatever. I call her under-necessary (Note: not UNnecessary, UNDER-necessary). I'm glad that her less-than-interesting character wasn't overused, I'm glad the movie wasn't turned into a straight-out romance.

The films deepest and most interesting character is Tucci's Dixon. On the surface he looks like your usual villain, but that's only to simpleton viewers who don't make any attempt to understand their movie characters. Dixon is not a villain. As it's established in the beginning, Dixon has been working the same job at the airport for seventeen years and wants desperately to climb up the latter. Because of this, he makes sure that he follows every single rule; he's the epitome of every by-the-book bureaucrat that we all love to hate. His motto is that in his work there're three important things, 'The person, the document and the story'. In the best scene of the movie Dixon refuses a Russian man to bring medicine to his dying father in Canada because he doesn't have the right form. This scene represents everything about the character of Dixon.

I was also interested in the relationship between Dixon and Narvorski. Dixon is at first refusing Narvorski because it's the rules, but as the film goes on and Dixon is further perplexed by Narvorski it stops being about rules and starts being about hatred and jealousy for Narvorski's joyful existence. He refuses to let Narvorski go to New York when he should be allowed to. In the film's most fulfilling scene Narvorski escapes and Dixon decides to give up chasing him, and you can see in his eyes that he's realized how ridiculous and stubborn he's been acting. This is Tucci's best performance. An Oscar for him, I say!

It is flawed, of course, in a few things. Narvorski's character is never developed, he stays the same person throughout the entire film, but that's fine, because Hanks keeps your interest and is at his most lovable. Also, the ending stretched on just a little bit…if I had my way it would've ended with Dixon happily watching Narvorski escape in his cab, the rest could've just as easily been implied. I think the ending is a very important part of any film, and this one was – in a way – ruined.

But, no movie is perfect, and I have no problem accepting this as a lighthearted picture with a few interesting characters.

⑺ 用英語介紹一部電影情節時用什麼時態

在敘述過去的故事或發生的事情時用現在時，稱為「歷史現在時」或「戲劇現在時」。運用這種時態，可給人以身臨其境的感覺，加強了故事的感染力。
1)在日常談話中，一個剛剛發生的動作可用一般現在時表示，因為說話人並不關注動作發生的時間。
2)有時，一般現在時也可以表示離現在較遠的動作或狀態。
3)在介紹書籍，電影情節，解說體育節目時，常用一般現在時代替過去時。
4)一般現在時常用來表示已死的人的動作或狀態。

⑻ 用英語介紹一部電影 內容包括電影簡介以及個人感悟

Dear, you:
I very much like the movie a lot
Like most of the movie name is: "a beautiful mind"
I very love starring the male star of Australia, called Russo Klau
The main contents of a schizophrenia are taught through the difficulties
Struggling in the real and unreal, try every means to overcome mental obstacles
Finally in the appeal of the power of love, his love love stroked his beautiful soul
He continued to study at the same time to students in class when the teacher was appointed Professor, his research has been the practice and achievements in the real life, finally he got Nobel prize stories. It shook my soul so I love this movie, that one reason enough.
親愛的,你好：
我非常喜歡的電影很多
最喜歡的電影名字叫：《美麗心靈》
主演是我非常喜歡的澳洲男明星,叫羅素克勞
主要內容是一個精神分裂症的教授通過重重困難
在現實和虛幻中掙扎,用盡一切辦法克服精神上的阻礙
最後在愛情力量的感召下,他的愛人充滿愛意撫摸著他美麗的心靈
他繼續研究的同時還給學生上課當了老師後來上任教授,他的研究在現實生活中得到了實踐和收獲,最終他獲得了諾貝爾獎的故事.它震撼了我的心靈所以我喜歡這部電影,這一個理由就夠了.

希望能幫到你，望採納，謝謝~

⑼ 怎麼用英語介紹一部電影內容說些什麼，喜

I was going to stay. So he gave me a job close her

⑽ 怎麼介紹一篇電影英語作文，求解答，謝謝